<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Construct Genograms, Part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.counsellingconnection.com/index.php/2008/07/01/how-to-construct-genograms-part-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.counsellingconnection.com/index.php/2008/07/01/how-to-construct-genograms-part-4/</link>
	<description>Training and content in counselling and life effectiveness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.counsellingconnection.com/index.php/2008/07/01/how-to-construct-genograms-part-4/#comment-4107</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counsellingconnection.com/index.php/2008/07/01/how-to-construct-genograms-part-4/#comment-4107</guid>
		<description>Hi Judy
You will find that there exists some slight variation of symbols depending on which text or journal you consult, but generally the symbols we have presented are universally recognisable. Of course, you may like to simplify or adapt the legend for use in your own practice (your clients will learn your modified symbols) but if you would like a broader spectrum of people to understand your genograms (perhaps for historic purposes), I would recommeded using the symbols as they have been presented. 
Thanks for your question. I hope this response is of assistance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Judy<br />
You will find that there exists some slight variation of symbols depending on which text or journal you consult, but generally the symbols we have presented are universally recognisable. Of course, you may like to simplify or adapt the legend for use in your own practice (your clients will learn your modified symbols) but if you would like a broader spectrum of people to understand your genograms (perhaps for historic purposes), I would recommeded using the symbols as they have been presented.<br />
Thanks for your question. I hope this response is of assistance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.counsellingconnection.com/index.php/2008/07/01/how-to-construct-genograms-part-4/#comment-4074</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counsellingconnection.com/index.php/2008/07/01/how-to-construct-genograms-part-4/#comment-4074</guid>
		<description>to Whom it May concern,

I found this very interesting but can one make up a genogram using their own &#039;legend&#039; or is the above universal language in symbology (Genograms)?

thank you,

Judy Clarke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to Whom it May concern,</p>
<p>I found this very interesting but can one make up a genogram using their own &#8216;legend&#8217; or is the above universal language in symbology (Genograms)?</p>
<p>thank you,</p>
<p>Judy Clarke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

